In the media, we often come across terms such as Islam or Islamism. Islam is mostly understood as a religion which is peaceful in its nature, whereas Islamism stands at the opposite side of the spectrum as an “extremist” ideology, exploiting Islam for political objectives. In this regard, an Islamist is perceived as an extremist, whereas a Muslim is considered to be a peaceful person professing the religion of Islam. This division makes a certain amount of sense since not every Muslim pursues the political aims motivated by their religion or practices violent jihad. Nevertheless, it is also a somewhat inaccurate division since actions of the so-called Islamists are based on Islamic doctrine just like actions of other Muslims. Therefore, we can call the so-called Islamists Muslims, just like we call the peaceful adherents Muslims.
This is particularly due to the religious-political nature of Islamic doctrine with the aim, among others, to spread Islam in a violent manner. Due to the dualistic ethics of Islam where individual principles contradict each other whilst both being true at the same time, we may consider Islamism to be part of Islam and Islamists to be Muslims. With regards to the current complex socio-political situation, we might discuss the impact of numerous non-Islamic elements on the formation of Islamic politics; if we aspire to describe its essential nature, though, we cannot do anything other than focus on Islamic doctrine which this politics primarily stems from.
We should take this perspective into consideration, especially nowadays when we generally disregard the impact of the political aspects of Islamic doctrine on current worldwide events. When trying to understand current events related to Islam, we cannot ignore the fact that for jihad warriors, political aspects of Islamic doctrine are the primary models for their actions. It is very misleading to label their practices as Islamism or something non-Islamic.
In order to understand Islamism, it is essential to know the fundamental elements of Islamic doctrine, which are typically perceived solely as a religion by the general public. Sociologist Peter Berger defines a religion as a human attitude towards a sacred order that includes within it all beings — human or otherwise — i.e. a belief in a cosmos, the meaning of which both includes and transcends man.
 In case of Islam, this concerns submission to the only god, Allah, and following the example of his messenger – Mohammed.
Mohammed is the last prophet (called the "seal of prophets" by Muslims). Mohammed passed on the only authentic religion to humankind, which describes the universal cosmic order, and he is supposed to be the perfect example for his followers – Muslims.  A Muslim is a person who accepts the only god Allah and Mohammed as his messenger. A Muslim must accept all of Allah's attributes which are defined in the Koran or referred to in one way or another through the actions or sayings of Prophet Mohammed (in the Sira or the Hadith, the so-called Sunna). Islam considers other prophets (e.g. Adam, Abraham, Jesus etc.) to be Mohammed's predecessors who spread the same belief; however, the so-called People of the Book (e.g. Christians and Jews) have deviated from this belief. [3, 4]
- For this reason, Mohammed's life and actions (the Sira and the Hadith) happen to be crucial for Islam and are described in detail in the so-called Sunna.  The Sira and the Hadith are essential Islamic works. All verses of the Koran are related to the Sunna, thanks to which we may understand the meaning of the Koran. This Trilogy of Islam (the Koran, the Sira and Hadith) constitutes the fundamental Islamic doctrine. Its nature is symbolically manifested in a rather contradictory personality of Mohammed who assumed the role of a preacher, politician and military leader in his life. These numerous distinct roles explain why Islamic doctrine comprises both political and religious rules. It is the main reason why Islam holds two views on nearly every subject relating to the Kafir (i.e. the Islamic term for unbelievers) — tolerant and intolerant. This is Islamic dualism. For example, the early religious peaceful Koran of Mecca is contradicted by the later political jihadi Koran of Medina. Since the Koran is replete with contradictions, it also provides a method to resolve the problem called abrogation. Abrogation means that the later verse is stronger than the earlier one. However, both verses are still true, since the Koran is the exact, precise word of Allah. Since Mohammed’s actions are the perfect pattern of behavior, his actions establish Islam’s dualistic ethics. Dualism gives Islam an incredible flexibility and adaptability.  Let us introduce several distinct examples of its dualistic nature.
- One may treat the Kafir in a friendly way. However, it is also allowed to behave violently towards them or enslave them. According to the Koran, the Muslim should not consider the Kafir to be their friend.
- To a large degree, women are unequal to men. In total, 89.4% from the 391 Bukhari Hadith about women assigns them lower status than men, 10% equal status and 0.6% higher status.
- More than 51% of the Trilogy does not concern religion as a personal relationship of a human being (a believer) to transcendent experience. These 51% of the Trilogy mostly deal with how the Muslim is supposed to treat the Kafir, and this part can, therefore, be marked as Political Islam. The rest of the text is Religious Islam. 
"Divine" laws called Sharia stem from the Islamic Trilogy. It is a set of rules all humankind is supposed to follow. It regulates the lives of all citizens (both the Muslim and the Kafir) as well as overall national politics. From this perspective, Islam may be described as a theocratic political system based on sacred Islamic literature.
Within such system, groups of non-agile adherents or people actively pursuing Political Islam naturally arise. Political Islam is very flexible and may acquire various forms. If required by the surrounding conditions, for instance, Sharia allows the Muslim to adhere to the Kafirs’ rules (but this situation is not ideal as the ideal state should adhere to Islamic rules).
It is obvious from the Trilogy that Islamic laws need to be spread either in peaceful manner or violently, and this fight is supposed to continue until all humankind completely submits to these rules. Fighting for the protection and spread of Islam is called jihad, and from the historical perspective, it is the most influential factor in its expansion.
3. JIHAD: KEY FACTOR IN ISLAMIC EXPANSION
During his lifetime, Mohammed subdued all tribes living in Arabia to Islam and established the first Islamic state adhering to Sharia law (or in other words, to the Trilogy). In that region nowadays, Saudi Arabia is still based on the same principles. Therefore, this country may be perceived as a "successor” of the original Islamic state.
The expansion of Islam was not due to the extraordinary nature of the religion, but simply due to the pursuit of politics and jihad. The efforts to spread Islam could have many forms – from means of persuasion to jihad of "finances" (such as bribery)  to psychological struggle to threatening to violence or theft.  Mohammed and his contingent began practicing jihad after migrating from Mecca to Medina. After having been outlawed from Mecca, he gained 100.000 followers in ten years thanks to his political practices and jihad, whereas in Mecca, where Mohammed had been spreading Islam through preaching, he had only gained approximately 150 followers (see the Fig. 1). Thus it is obvious that political practice and jihad were much more effective than religion during the conversion of Arabs to Islam. 
After returning to Mecca, Mohammed proclaimed jihad an obligation for every Muslim – meaning the whole Muslim community (i.e. umma). The meaning of jihad can be illustrated by several examples from the Sunna and the Koran. 
- Mohammed found Muslims practicing jihad superior to other Muslims:
"Believers who stay at home in safety, other than those who are disabled, are not equal to those who fight with their wealth and their lives for Allah’s cause [jihad]." (Koran 4:95)
- During his lifetime, Mohammed was ordered by Allah that jihad would be practiced until humankind is subdued to Islamic law:
"I have been ordered to wage war against mankind until they accept that there is no god but Allah and that they believe I am His prophet and accept all revelations spoken through me. When they do these things I will protect their lives and property unless otherwise justified by Islamic law, in which case their fate lies in Allah’s hands." (Sahih Muslim, Book 1, Hadith 31)
"A time will come when the people will wage holy war, and it will be asked, ‘Is there any amongst you who has enjoyed the company of Mohammed?’ They will say: ‘Yes.’ And then victory will be bestowed upon them. They will wage holy war again, and it will be asked: ‘Is there any among you who has enjoyed the company of the companions of Mohammed?’ They will say: ‘Yes.’ And then victory will be bestowed on them." (Sahih of Al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 52, Hadith 146)
- It is also very important for the Muslim practicing jihad that they are entitled to take the spoils of war, and in case of death, a place is ensured for them in Paradise. Jihad supporters have been promised to gain the same benefit as jihadists:
"Allah promises the jihadi with pure intent either a place in Paradise or a return to his home with spoils of war and the guarantee of Allah’s reward in the afterlife." (Sahih of Al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 53, Hadith 352)
"Anyone who arms a jihadist is rewarded just as a fighter would be; anyone who gives proper care to a holy warrior’s dependents is rewarded just as a fighter would be.” (Sahih of Al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 52, Hadith 96)
- Jihad is understood as an obligation for every Muslim and is valid as long as it is necessary; however, jihad is also a permanent battle. When the Muslim thought that days of warfare were over, Mohammed himself proclaimed that there would always be a group committed to fight:
"After all those victories some Muslims started saying that days of warfare are over and they even started selling their arms. Mohammed, however, forbade it and said: ‘Not a single retinue committed to fight for truth disappears from my people until antichrist occurs.” 
By means of jihad, Mohammed established the ground for future expansion of united Islamized Arab tribes.  Nevertheless, Islamic expansion is not assured only by jihad. In the event of apostasy from Islam, the apostate is threatened with death. Family politics plays its role in this matter as well; according to Islamic doctrine, a Muslim woman can only be married to a Muslim man, and a Muslim man should marry a Muslim woman; if he married a Christian or a Jew, the children must be raised as Muslims). [11, 12]
3.1 Expansion of Islam
After the death of Prophet Mohammed in 632, a reign of caliphs who were both political and religious leaders was established. It was a period of Islamization of already subdued tribes in Arabia as well as enormous expansion of Islam outside of Arabia. Caliphs followed the example of Mohammed and made more and more territories submit.
The expansion was also enhanced by the enfeeblement of the extensive Eastern Roman and Persian Empires due to their mutual wars. Apart from that, the Eastern Roman Empire was affected by conflicts with German and Slavic tribes. It also experienced internal disputes including those between Christians and Monophysitists or other religious peoples, particularly in the Eastern provinces. These factors substantially facilitated conditions for the united Arab tribes of caliphs to conquer the lands.
Before the Muslim invasion itself, Kafir citizens of the neighboring countries had a choice of conversion to Islam or warfare. If they did not convert, war was declared. Loads of conquered men were killed, the rest of the citizens who did not convert to Islam were enslaved or had the dhimmi status imposed on them. These were particularly Christians and Jews, who were allowed to maintain their religion on the basis of a treaty and as part of Sharia law. [13, 14]
Dhimmi life was not easy for the Kafir and that was the reason why they later converted to Islam and could thus become citizens with full rights. The oppression of the dhimmi continued in the Modern age and continues even nowadays.  It is mostly evident from the activities of the Islamic State (ISIS) where Kafir women are sexual slaves just like in Mohammed's times (e.g. Sahih of Al-Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 46, Hadith 717). 
Approximately one hundred years after Mohammed's death, the caliphate expanded to Northern Africa, Spain, and Central Asia, and reached the borders of China and India (see the Fig. 2). The Muslim progress in the West was cut off at Poitiers in 732 by Charles Martel. Another substantial expansion of Islam was brought about by Turkic tribes that in 1071 dominated most of Asia Minor. They pushed Islam far into Central Asia and India in the East. From the 14th century onwards, Europe was facing continuous expansion of the Ottoman Empire. Turks were defeated at Vienna in 1683, which became a crucial landmark. Islamization also progressed to other areas such as Indonesia or Sahel.  The Muslim world currently comprises approximately 40 countries (see the Fig. 3).
3.2 Downturn of Jihad
Islamic countries saw great cultural and economic development in particular at the beginning of Islamization thanks to the very advanced Kafir cultures of Egypt, the Byzantine Empire, the Persian Empire, and Asia. Numerous discoveries originating from the subjugated countries are credited to Islamic countries to this day. This early period is often called the Golden Age of Islam. Nevertheless, with ever-increasing Islamization of the conquered countries lasting for several centuries, the Golden Age vanished and those areas gradually deteriorated. With a few exceptions such as Spain and Cyprus, the Kafir territories became permanently Muslim or with majority Muslim populations (see the Fig. 3).
Over time, the principles in the Islamic and non-Islamic worlds differentiated from each other more and more. Whereas Islamic doctrine remained the essential element in the functioning of the society in Islamic countries, the opposite trend emerged in Kafir countries. Religion and politics were gradually separated, and these countries became more developed than Islamic ones. In the 19th century, a large percentage of the lands of the Islamic World became colonies of European Kafir countries. Islam never took root permanently in these countries and was actually always driven out of them when it tried to conquer them.
This situation was very far removed from the ideal patterns of Prophet Mohammed and his goals set up by jihad. It thus makes sense that, especially in countries of the Islamic world, there is an ever-increasing desire to overturn this situation and continue with Islamization – the spreading of the only correct "godly order". Another goal is to achieve a revival of Islam in Islamic countries colonized by Kafirs. However, their political as well as economic powers are insufficient for that. The present time can be considered a turning point, since Western European countries are much more confronted with Islam due to their colonies and their cultures are gradually being more and more influenced by each other.
3.3 Modern Jihad
The 20th century brought big changes for both the Islamic and non-Islamic worlds. At the beginning of the century, there was the Great War and the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire that had had the character of Islamic caliphate – or the “godly state” – since the 16th century. The caliphate was abolished in 1924, which symbolically marks the decline of Islamic countries and Islamic politics. Turkey, the traditional "Islamic state", set off on a journey from caliphate to democracy. The entirety of Europe saw great economic development at that time. Nevertheless, crude oil was discovered in the Middle East in the ‘20s and some traditionally poor Islamic countries would gradually get rich and gain substantial international influence from their petroleum exportation. At the same time, Egypt ceased to be a British colony in 1922. Therefore, excellent conditions for a re-established growth of jihad and spread of Islam emerged there. Within Islam, groups of adherents, aspiring to revive the traditional Islamic rules according to Mohammed as their example grew stronger. They strived for a return to the early Islamic times when Islam had boomed due to the politics of jihad.
Shortly after the elimination of the last caliphate in 1928, the Muslim Brotherhood appeared (Al-Ichwan Al-Muslimun) in Egypt – the first decolonized country. The Muslim Brotherhood preaches the return to the traditional interpretation of the Koran as the basis for healthy Islamic society. It rejects modernization, secularism or any Western influence. Its ultimate goals are a common Muslim nation and a revival of the caliphate in a form adjusted to current conditions. This community gained enormous political power. With their ever-increasing power, they have resorted to armed attacks just like Prophet Mohammed did. Thanks to enormous financial support from Saudi Arabia, many schools and health centers were opened in Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood had an impact on companies and banks, were in charge of trade unions and were part of the Parliament. They attempted a coup in Syria and have a strong position in Jordan. 
After World War II, Islam actually took root in Western Europe due to the migration of citizens from Muslim countries to Western Europe. In Western societies, the ‘60s brought political and social relief as well as the completion of the process of decolonization of Africa by European countries. The Muslim Brotherhood started the movement called Hamas, and another organization called Al-Qaeda sprang from it, too. [18, 19] Islamic organizations and movements gained an increasingly higher influence in Europe. In the course of the 20th century, their power gradually rose. In the 21st century, the organization called ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham) was established which declared an Islamic State in the conquered territories of Syria, Iraq and Lebanon. ISIS eliminated borders of the national states and declared itself the restorer of the lost Islamic empire. They decided to continue with warfare that had lasted for centuries.  We should also realize that modern jihad could hardly exist in such an extent as it does nowadays were it not for the financial support from Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states. Liberal member of the Kuwaiti Parliament Nabil Al-Fadil said: “There is not a single bomb in Syria without some of the parts being financed by Kuwait.” 
Due to the fact that the umma does not currently have a united leader, these organizations or movements have various representatives and their policies vary. The organizations use modern technologies, approaches to influencing society, nationalism etc. However, there is one common link – Political Islam. They are based on jihad and the example of Prophet Mohammed, their objective being to enshrine Sharia law throughout the whole world. From this perspective, we can call this period modern jihad. In academic and, subsequently, political arenas, terms such as Islamic fundamentalism or Islamism have been used. The most frequently used term is Islamism and Islamists.
Although the term Islamism is currently used in the media, its meaning has not been precisely defined yet. Generally speaking, the Western terminology for different elements of Islam gradually changes with regards to the relationship of the West towards Islam and is a certain result of the Western need to describe the state of contemporary Islam. 
In the 18th century, Voltaire defined the term Islamisme as Mohammed's religion,  an analogy to Buddhism or Christianity. Islamism had the same meaning as Islam or the term used at that time – Mohammedanism. Islamism acquired a negative meaning in the 19th century, its characteristics including a lack of vitality, aggression and something which in its nature leads to decay.  In the early 20th century, Encyclopaedia of Islam was published,  and since then the Arabic word Islam, which means "submission", has been used to define the religion of Allah.
Nowadays, Islamism appears in technical texts where it denotes a political ideology or a political orientation:
- that demands man's complete adherence to the sacred law of Islam and rejects as much as possible outside influence, with some exceptions (such as access to military and medical technology). It is imbued with a deep antagonism towards the non-Muslim and has a particular hostility towards the West. It amounts to an effort to turn Islam, a religion and civilization, into an ideology. 
- which believes that Islam should guide social and political as well as personal life. 
- as a political ideology based on a reinvented version of Islamic law. 
The News Media mostly link Islamism with terrorist attacks or extremist acts which are justified by means of exploitation of Islam. It is defined as an ideology that exploits Islam for political purposes. As explained above, it is evident that definitions of Islamism differentiate and change with time but its nature is always based on the sacred Trilogy of the Koran, the Sira and the Hadith. The objective of Islamism is to fulfill political aspects of Islam according to the example of Prophet Mohammed. Although these tendencies have grown stronger rather recently, it is apparent that the purpose of Islamism is to spread jihad – fight for the protection and expansion of Islam. Therefore, it is a natural continuation of jihad, already happening for centuries. Throughout history, there was always a certain part of the umma actively practicing jihad that was either violent or peaceful, depending on the surrounding conditions. This type of expansion is enormously successful and Islam is currently the second biggest religion in the world, aspiring to become the biggest religion the future.  From this perspective, the term Islamism defined in such a way is just a cliché. Moreover, we should realize that everything that originates in the Trilogy of the Koran, the Sira and the Hadith is Islam.
Furthermore, according to technical literature, where Islamism differs from Islam is the fact that unlike historical Islamic conceptions of the state and legislation, Islamism substantially reflects the impact of the West. For that reason, some researchers concur in the opinion that Islamism is the Muslim equivalent of European nationalism or totalitarian movements of the 20th century. Fundamentalism (either traditional or modern), and even more so Islamism, are not considered to be natural sprouts of real Islam but fruits of an unequal interaction with a more powerful opponent. 
Due to the complex political situation and the historical impact of Kafir cultures on Islamic politics, we may undoubtedly identify impacts in the Islamic politics, including nationalism and totalitarian movements of the 20th century. Since there are approximately 1.7 billion Muslims, it is only natural that there are numerous movements and trends in Islam. In addition to that, there is currently not a sole leader in Islam as in Mohammed's times. Therefore, it makes sense that in order to reach the goals of jihad, various means and ways of fighting are used.
Economic, political, and territorial reasons, the “brotherhood” of Islam and Christianity or migration are all utilized for this fight. Nationalisms, revanchist claims, and totalitarian regimes of the 20th century were actually more of a means to reach these goals. They were not the common historical denominator – that is Political Islam.
It is vital to realize that already from the early Islamic period until the present, Islamic doctrine is the common element for all those political movements, particularly its political aspect containing jihad. The objective is to impose a religious political system, a theocracy, from the Islamic perspective, whose rules are sacred and came from the only God Allah. This fight is from the nature of Islamic doctrine eternal, admittedly currently fostered by the unequal interaction of Islam with its more powerful opponent and other current issues. From this perspective, this state is a natural development of the politics of Islam and jihad – Political Islam.
5. POLITICAL ISLAM
Political Islam is based on the part of the Islamic doctrine that is not concerned solely with religion, meaning a personal relationship of an adherent to transcendent experience or something sacred, but it also deals with the relationship of Islam to the Kafir. This concerns more than a half of the texts of the Trilogy.
Political Islam provides rules for the functioning of a country or society, laws and international politics related to both the Muslim and the Kafir. Various Islamic movements and political parties are based on Political Islam. To call some of those movements Islamist or non-Muslim just because we do not like them, since they practise violent jihad or use modern methods of organization, is inaccurate to say the least. Those are Islamic movements that aspire to fulfill the wishes and reach the goals expressed by their perfect Godly messenger – Prophet Mohammed.
It is also misleading, for instance, to consider the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood or Al-Qaeda to be Islamists. These leaders know Islamic doctrine in detail. A good example is Sayyid Qutb, an "ideologue" of the Muslim Brotherhood, and his work In the Shade of the Qur’an. Qutb’s command of Islamic doctrine is probably much higher than that of the majority of people from the Islamic world. We cannot say that these leaders somehow twist Islam because they encourage violence. Without the existence of Political Islam and violent jihad, hardly any historical growth of Islam could have happened. Islam would not stand against a much more developed "opponent" as it does today.
Nowadays, only violent jihad attracts attention, but the spread of Political Islam was mainly through non-violent jihad (e.g. by persuasion or finances). One example of the modern non-violent spread of Islam and its rooting in Europe is Muslim migration into the European Union.
Exploitation of migration for conquering new lands is a rather modern phenomenon since it was not traditionally recommended to the Muslim to stay in Kafir cultures.  Although the pattern of the Hijra was set by Mohammed leaving Mecca going to Medina. Muslim migration in the 2nd half of the 20th century led to an enormous growth and enshrinement of Islam in Western Europe, something which Islam had never managed before when attempting to conquer Europe. The increasing number of religious Islamic subjects not only proves the speed of the Islamic expansion in Europe but also its financial power (see the Figs. 4, 5).
Areas with high percentages of Muslim populations gradually arise in Europe as well as "parallel societies" that function according to the rules of Sharia law.  An extended network of organizations funded by Saudi-Arabian financial resources and the international arms of the Muslim Brotherhood enhance the rise of Political Islam inside Muslim communities. At the same time, they influence the local national politics. In this regard, mosques, associations, charities, and educational institutions play distinct roles.  Due to this cooperation, European politics is being affected and the integration of Sharia law into the European legislation and court decisions is becoming common, too. All of this is happening despite the fact that the European Court for Human Rights established that Sharia law is not compatible with democratic regimes. 
Political Islam and the rules of Sharia derived from it are becoming an ever-increasing problem of the clash of Islamic and Kafir cultures. According to the director of the European Values think-tank Radko Hokovský, countries have not been able to clearly define as of yet what is acceptable within the interpretation of Islam and what is not. Thus confusion repeatedly arises on this issue. It has been very difficult for political representatives, intellectuals and the legal community to define those parts of Islam that profess to be religion and are perceived as such but are in fact a political ideology. In addition, its aim is to suppress fundamental elements of the democratic rule of law. In Hokovský’s opinion, Islam is a religious-political-legal complex, a theocracy, which is contrary to the historically transformed European understanding of religion, as applied for instance to Christianity. 
Signatories of the declaration of the Muslim reformist movement are aware of this situation and they, among others, refuse violent jihad, religious political movements, the establishment of a caliphate or the enshrinement of Sharia law. They consider Sharia law to be rules created by humans. They support the separation of church and state, public criticism of Islam, and freedom of speech. Such reformation basically rejects Political Islam. This aspiration is really revolutionary since it rejects elementary elements of Islam as well as it does not have any substantial footing in the Trilogy. Besides, from the perspective of a certain part of the umma, any kind of reformation of Islam may be considered apostasy.
Islam has already made its way into European politics. Federica Mogherini, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, claims that Political Islam is supposed to be part of the picture of European politics. Mogherini said: “Religion plays a role in politics – not always for good, not always for bad. Religion can be part of the process.” Criticizing Islam has gradually become a "taboo" and its critics are labeled as Islamophobes or accused of spreading hatred against the Muslim.
Islamism is a rather misleading term, particularly when it is not considered to be part of Islam. Political Islam is based on the Trilogy of Islam, its goals can be found directly in the source texts of Islamic doctrine and its leaders, described as Islamists by the media, have excellent knowledge of the doctrine. Its political goals are based on the example of Prophet Mohammed. Concerning both the historical development of Islam’s politics and jihad and the current reality, the so-called Islamism is part of Political Islam. Its goal is to reach a state where the citizens’ behavior is led by Islamic religious regulations – the Sharia.
These religious regulations are already gradually becoming part of the European law in some cases. This situation is, however, in direct contradiction to secularism as well as the declared reformation of Islam. The fact that European politicians support Islam as a whole, not only as religion – i.e. non-Political Islam – is a serious issue. It is particularly very obvious that European political and intellectual elites are reluctant to critically analyze Islamic doctrine. The view that violent and political elements are actually part of the Islamic source texts is frequently considered to be xenophobic or hateful, even though it is easy to prove scientifically.
European Islam is, therefore, assuming its political character in contemporary Europe. Unfortunately, this tendency is encouraged by European politicians who submit to legitimize political requirements of Islam and do not criticize the doctrine. With the ostracism of anybody who dares to criticize Islam, assertiveness of those striving to pursue its goals in Europe increases. Nowadays, this is mostly achieved by non-violent means – however, that does not mean that such means are lawful. The goals of Political Islam are contradictory to the fundamental ideas of European society such as the universality of human rights, gender equality and the separation of church and state. It is legitimate to criticize Islam on those grounds. Fulfillment of Islam’s political goals would actually have a negative and substantial impact on all European citizens.
Both viewed from a historical perspective as well as when examining the doctrine of jihad, there is always a group within the umma that fights for the spread of Islam. Fighting is, therefore, a very natural and sacred element in Islam. These rules should be spread and applied to everybody – both Kafirs (non-Muslims) and Muslims. This is the essence of Political Islam. It is the reason why Political Islam can be defined as the part of Islamic doctrine and law that applies to us, Kafirs. The remainder of Islam can be deemed as a religion – every Muslim’s personal business. It is inaccurate to call this trend Islamism and its followers Islamists or those who exploit Islam. If we want to be accurate, we may use the terms Political Islam, Islamic movements, violent jihad, jihadist etc. When some behavior is based on the Islamic Trilogy and the example of Mohammed, it is an integral part of Islam.
Center for the Study of Political Islam
 BOWKER, J. W. The concise Oxford dictionary of world religions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
 Quran. As example 7:158, 3:32.
 KATHEER, I. a TRANSLATION AND RESEARCHED BY RESEARCH DEPARTMENT OF DARUSSALAM. Early days: stories of the beginning of Creation and the early prophet[s] from Adam to Yoonus: taken from Al-Bidayah wan-nihayah. Riyadh: Darussalam, 2010.
 Quran, as example surahs 43:12, 2:213, 2:124-133.
 "Sunnah." In The Islamic World: Past and Present. Ed. John L. Esposito. Oxford Islamic Studies Online. [on-line]. 2016, <http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t243/e332>.
 SAHIH AL BUKHARI [on-line]. www.sunnah.com, 2016. http://sunnah.com/bukhari/7/21,7,331.
 WARNER, B. Sharia Law for the Non-Muslim. CSPI LLC, 2016, p. 24.
 WARNER B. Sharia Law for the Non-Muslim. CSPI LLC 2016, p. 9, 18, 24, 27-28, 30, 47.
 WARNER B. The Hadith: The Sunna of Mohammed. CSPI LLC. 2010, p. 9, 10, 13.
 MUIR W., The Life of Mohammed. New York: AMS Press, 1975, p. 448.
 Quran, 2:220, 2:221.
 Al-Misri, Ahman Ibn Naqib. Reliance of the traveler: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law. Beltsville: Amana publications, 2008.
 Immigration in Islamic Doctrine and History. [on-line].
cspi-cz.blogspot.cz, 2015. http://cspi-int.blogspot.cz/2015/10/immigration-in-islamic-doctrine-and.html .
 ESPOSITO, J. The Oxford dictionary of Islam. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
 SAHIH AL BUKHARI. [on-line]. www.sunnah.com, 2016. http://sunnah.com/bukhari/49/25.
 BRISARD J-Ch. Zarkaoui, le nouveau visage d’Al-Qaida. librairie Artheme Fayard, 2005, p.81.
 GUNARATNA R. Al-Qaida, au coer du premier réseau terroriste mondial. Editions Autrement Drontieres, 2002, p.116.
 WEISS, Michael a Hassan HASSAN. Isis: inside the army of terror. New York, NY: Regan Arts, 2015.
 HIRSI ALI, A. Heretic: Why Islam needs a reformation now. United States: HarperPaperbacks, 2016.
 KRAMER M. Coming to Terms: Fundamentalists or Islamists?. Middle East Quarterly, 2013. s. 65.
 Quoted in André Versaille, Dictionnaire de la pensée de Voltaire par lui-même (Brussels: Complexe, 1994).
 MARWAN R. B., "Islam and the Foreign Office: An Investigation of Religious and Political Revival in 1873," in his Formation and Perception of the Modern Arab World (Princeton: Darwin Press, 1989), p. 72.
 ARNOLD, T. W. “Islam” Encyclopaedia of Islam, First Edition (1913-1936) [on-line]. 2016,
 Pipes Daniel. Distinguishing between Islam and Islamism. [on-line]. 1998.
 BERMAN, Sheri. Islamism, Revolution, and Civil Society. Perspective on Politics [online]. 2003, 1, 257-272
 TIBI, Bassam. Islamism and Islam. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.
 Pew Research Center. “The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010-2050 [on-line]. 2015.
 Immigration in Islamic Doctrine and History. [on-line]. cspi-cz.blogspot.cz, 2015.
 CASE OF REFAH PARTİSİ (THE WELFARE PARTY) AND OTHERS v. TURKEY. ECHR [online]. 2003.
 Džihádismus z islámu sice vychází, ale není jeho hlavní příčinou, vysvětluje politolog [on-line].
 The chart is based on the data from the website: http://www.moscheesuche.de/.
 The chart is based on the data released in Le Figaro: Les lieux de culte musulmans ont doublé en vingt ans [on-line]. Le Figaro. 2011. http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2011/08/30/01016-20110830ARTFIG00587-les-lieux-de-culte-musulmans-ont-double-en-vingt-ans.php.